Fellow Tokyo resident and budding legal scholar Joe and I have
previously discussed the legality of women-only train cars in Japan.
See Joe’s take on the issue here,
or see my own prior posts here and here.
Some background information for those of you new to the subject. In
Japan, trains and subways are packed during rush hour. The Tokyo
Police Department reported that the number of groping cases rose from
778 in 1996 to 2,201 in 2004. Are Japanese men just that hornier eight
years later? Probably not — more likely, women have finally found the
courage to speak up (a major concern in the comments section of the
previous posts), and technology has paved the way. Cell phones that
can send email and take pictures, are excellent tools for proving the
charges, finding the culprit, and promptly reporting the offense. 21st
century Japanese women have decided that they ain’t gonna take it.
This is all welcome news.
But the official threefold increase has motivated the authorities to do
something. Forty years ago Japan had women-only cars. Osaka
reintroduced them a few years ago, and now some subway and train lines
in Tokyo have followed suit. Now, during rush hours, there are train
cars for women only, also known in Tokyo as "pink cars." For many,
this is a royal pain — the subways are cramped enough as it is. Now
the men get shoved in even harder. Plus, isn’t it sexist? Would this
survive a discrimination suit in the US? Does its implementation
violate Japan’s constitution?
It isn’t just us star students of jurisprudence getting all pissy about
this. Take Takahito Yamao — civil rights hero — who started an
organization to oppose women-only train cars and organize protests to
take on this sexist garbage. So far, his group has 46 members.
"This system is discriminating against men… We pay
the same fare and yet are labeled as evil persons. Not all men are
gropers. This is insulting."
Preach it, brother!
Yamao and his group make some good points: excluding men from some cars
doesn’t eradicate the problem of molestors; trains are packed at times
outside of rush hour. Yamao suggests train companies install security
cameras inside each car, increase the number of guards on platforms,
and give discount tickets during the off-peak hours. Until then, he’s
taking his protests to the front lines and defiantly riding
the pink car! Rosa Parks, step aside!
So, are the police rushing to arrest him? Not at all: it turns out all the fuss we made over the legality of these things was for naught. Cooperation is voluntary. The pink signs, the broadcasts over the intercom informing commuters of the women-only cars, the entire thing is a charade! Men can ride the pink car as long as they don’t mind ignoring the repeated polite requests from women to leave.
I think American men would see "voluntary" pink cars and ride them just to spite the system. In Japan, such antagonists are few and far between — but at least all 46 of them now have a support group to help them cope with their rebellion against the system.
[powered by WordPress.]
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« May | Jul » | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Mao: The Unknown Story - by Jung Chang and Jon Halliday:
A controversial and damning biography of the Helmsman.
34 queries. 0.414 seconds
July 28th, 2005 at 1:09 am
As a male I have and will continue to ride in women only train cars. I refuse to be treated like a criminal because of my gender. I pay the same price that women do for tickets but now the train company expects me to accept less service than women? Unacceptable.