-
“Yahoo, Microsoft, IBM, HP, Dell- everyone is here in India. .. Compared to them, Google has not taken India too seriously until now.”
-
“It took an undiplomatic Chinese diplomat to tell China and America what we both need to hear: “It is high time to shut up!”"
-
“The mao has become unnecessary and is being retired from Chinese “
-
KOREA - Pooper power plays“At the WTO’s (World Toilet Organization) annual meeting in Moscow recently, there was a power grab by Sim Dae-Juk, chairman of the South Korean Toilet Association, who announced that he was forming a rival group called the World Toilet Associatio”
-
“a few hours before Xinhua announced the removal of Chen Liangyu, the Chinese Internet authority suddenly ordered portal sites to open their online forums and not to limit netizens’ speech.”
[link]
September 29th, 2006 at 12:08 pm
[…] Speaking of Maoists, via Weifang Radish via AsiaPundit: China’s People’s Daily proclaims Mao obsolete (but there’s a catch). […]
October 7th, 2006 at 2:45 pm
“: “Now that we have such impressive economic progress in China when and how do you envision democracy developing?” They looked at him, aghast. Finally, one answered for the group: “Do we want to destroy all the progress China has made?”"
That’s a trick question. It looks like the Chinese people understanding of communism is the similar as that of the American. That Communism and Democracy are opposite extremes. It is a very shallow understanding.
You cannot call a country Communist unless it is first a democracy. All people of history who have given serious thoguht on this matter know this. A Communist country without democracy is Communist by name only.
From Adolt Hitler, Chapter 2 Mein Kampf: ” The Jewish doctrine of Marxism rejects the aristocratic principle of Nature and replaces the eternal privilege of power and strength by the MASS OF NUMBERS and their dead weight. ”
To Albert Einstein, on why socialism: ” Nevertheless, it is necessary to remember that A PLANNED ECONOMY IS NOT YET SOCIALISM. A planned economy as such may be accompanied by the complete enslavement of the individual. The achievement of socialism requires the solution of some extremely difficult socio-political problems: how is it possible, in view of the far-reaching centralization of political and economic power, to prevent bureaucracy from becoming all-powerful and overweening?”